|
|
|
| Empowering Rural Revitalization through Rural Reading: The Multiple Logics of Cultural Inheritance, Grassroots Governance, and Industrial Integration |
| XU Di1,2,LU Siqi1,ZHENG Shaowu3,* |
1. Journalism and Information Communication School of HUST, 430074, Wuhan, China 2. Philosophy and Social Sciences Laboratory of Big data and national communication strategy, Ministry of Education, 430074, Wuhan, China 3. National Governance Journal, People's Daily Press, 100026, Beijing, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the context of China’s rural revitalization strategy, rural reading has emerged as an increasingly vital cultural practice that transcends traditional knowledge dissemination to become a multidimensional mechanism for cultural inheritance, grassroots governance, and rural economic development. This study constructs a comprehensive analytical framework — Culture–Governance–Economy — to explore how rural reading activities function as embedded cultural mechanisms within local communities, and contribute to developing sustainable rural cultural ecosystems. Employing a qualitative, multi-case research design, this study draws on representative cases from Jiangsu, Shandong, Henan, Hunan, and other provinces. Through policy document analysis, media report extraction, and case-based interpretation, it explores the institutional logic, implementation practices, and governance functions of rural reading. The research reveals that reading activities have evolved into symbolic and participatory platforms that integrate community identity-building, knowledge empowerment, and cultural mobilization. The findings revealthat rural reading generates significant impacts across three dimensions. In the cultural dimension, reading activates local resources including oral traditions, village chronicles, revolutionary histories, and intangible heritage, fostering spiritual consensus and reinforcing the symbolic order of rural life. In the governance dimension, rural reading spaces, such as farmhouse libraries, “reading corners, ” and village culture halls, serve as low-threshold arenas for deliberation and social negotiation, enabling villagers to engage in value coordination, policy interpretation, and participatory governance. In the economic dimension, reading practices are increasingly embedded in rural industrial chains, supporting cultural-tourism integration, creative branding, and the transformation of cultural capital into economic value. To enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of rural reading practices, this study proposes a four-dimensional optimization framework. First, structural embedding entails institutionalizing rural reading as a core component of public cultural service systems and broader rural revitalization strategies. Second, institutional support emphasizes the establishment of multi-actor collaboration involving village cadres, young officials, respected local leaders (xiangxian), and social organizations, thereby forming a stable and coordinated operational network. Third, urban–rural coordination focuses on developing resource-sharing mechanisms and facilitating bidirectional knowledge flows between urban and rural cultural infrastructures to address structural disparities. Finally, subject-oriented responsiveness calls for tailoring reading services to the diverse needs of rural populations, including the elderly, youth, women, and left-behind children, by conducting participatory needs assessments and designing culturally relevant, localized reading content. These four dimensions collectively aim to construct an embedded, adaptive, and sustainable rural reading service system. In conclusion, rural reading has evolved from a peripheral cultural initiative into a strategic instrument for cultivating community cohesion, enhancing governance capacity, and fostering culturally driven development. This study advances the theoretical understanding of rural cultural empowerment and offers practical recommendations for transforming reading practices into institutionalized, participatory, and development-oriented mechanisms within the broader agenda of rural revitalization in China.
|
|
Published: 05 June 2025
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Shaowu ZHENG
|
|
|
|
| 文化传承与乡风涵养 | 文化空间与基层治理 | 文化赋能与产业融合 | | 延续乡土文化根脉 | 构建公共议事空间 | 嵌入乡村产业体系 | | 激发节庆文化活力 | 促进村民价值共创 | 推进文旅融合发展 | | 强化本土文化认同 | 提升治理协同性能 | 培育文化品牌机制 | | 培育乡风文明氛围 | 中介主体联动治理 | 注入经济发展动能 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗: 在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].(2022-10-25)[2025-04-25]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.
|
| 2 |
罗哲,唐迩丹.农村公共文化服务的结构转型:从“城市文化下乡”到“乡村文化振兴”[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019(5):129-135.
|
| 3 |
新华社. 中共中央国务院印发《乡村振兴战略规划(2018—2022年)》[EB/OL].(2018-09-26)[2025-04-25]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-09/26/content_5325534.htm.
|
| 4 |
新华社. 中共中央国务院关于推进实施乡村振兴战略的意见[EB/OL].(2018-02-04). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-02/04/content_5263807.htm.
|
| 5 |
文化和旅游部关于印发《“十四五”公共文化服务体系建设规划》的通知[EB/OL].(2021-06-23)[2025-04-25]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-06/23/content_5620456.htm.
|
| 6 |
何晓龙.乡村振兴背景下农村公共文化新型供给机制研究:基于“自主文化社会”的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024(5):24-34.
|
| 7 |
张顾颖. 书香润乡村!江苏如东: 全民阅读赋能乡村振兴[EB/OL].(2023-10-11)[2025-04-25]. https://www.whb.cn/zhuzhan/cs/20231011/543469.html.
|
| 8 |
童轩, 周亚云, 杨冬丽. 南通通州东社镇: 农家书屋飘出党的创新理论声[EB/OL].(2024-08-21)[2025-04-25]. https://www.yangtse.com/zncontent/3966106.html.
|
| 9 |
高衎. 长沙望城区: “阅见未来”点亮乡村阅读明灯[EB/OL].(2024-01-10)[2025-04-25]. https://www.cnr.cn/hunan/flxw/wl/20240110/t20240110_526553083.shtml.
|
| 10 |
杨丽君. 襄州洪山头社区: 乡贤喜读社区志共话振兴谋发展[EB/OL].(2024-04-03)[2025-04-25]. https://news.hubeidaily.net/mobile/c_2445855.html.
|
| 11 |
傅蕾, 陈卓韬. 湖南新田: 读村史诵家风蔚然成风[EB/OL].(2017-04-11)[2025-04-25]. http://news.cnr.cn/native/city/20170411/t20170411_523702747.shtml.
|
| 12 |
姜峰. 走进村史馆, 了解乡土中国[N]. 人民日报, 2023-09-20(13).
|
| 13 |
赵洪杰, 于新悦, 刘兵. 467部村史, 留住乡村根与魂[N]. 大众日报, 2024-11-17(01).
|
|
|
|