Modernization represents a shared historical and practical challenge for both China and the global community. As a major theoretical innovation by the Communist Party of China, the Chinese path to modernization presents a distinct framework and practice originating in China that requires systematic, in-depth explication and dissemination through publishing. Within this endeavor, thematic publishing performs a policy-driven, agenda-setting role and serves as a key lever for the high-quality development of the publishing industry. Thematic publishing on the Chinese path to modernization is defined as a focused subfield dedicated to the systematic, sustained, and large-scale communication of its evolving theoretical framework. As a concrete program for scaled and deep explication and dissemination, it integrates organized knowledge production with diversified narrative forms and channels. This approach supports the autonomous construction of a national knowledge system on modernization, advances the authoritative communication of core concepts, and strengthens China’s international discourse power in global debates on modernization. In doing so, it undergirds public recognition of the theory, establishes a benchmark for high-quality growth across thematic publishing and the broader sector, and contributes to translating theoretical innovation into practical impetus for advancing socialist modernization—while also offering Chinese path to global modernization challenges. Current practices exhibit three prominent characteristics: first, scholarly content that evidences a strong sense of epochal mission and addresses strategic questions arising from modernization; second, the parallel advancement of interdisciplinary interpretation and public-facing communication that links academic discourse with societal understanding across print, digital, and audiovisual media; third, the use of themed events as catalysts for knowledge dissemination, generating spillover effects across education, media, and cultural venues that extend title lifecycles and foster iterative reader engagement. Nevertheless, several constraints remain. The knowledge genealogy requires further refinement, particularly in aligning thematic clusters with disciplinary traditions, foundational works, and cutting-edge scholarship. Technological enablement remains uneven, including gaps in data-informed curation, AI-assisted editorial workflows, linked-data metadata, and multimodal content production. The effectiveness of international communication needs deeper development through improved audience segmentation, higher-fidelity translation and localization pipelines, co-publishing partnerships, rights-circulation mechanisms, and evaluation frameworks capable of capturing both cognitive uptake and behavioral outcomes. It is argued that thematic publishing on the Chinese path to modernization constitutes a distinctive and replicable paradigm for high-quality development in publishing. Its systematized narrative construction, scalable dissemination strategies, and accessible expression provide method and institutional mechanisms for converting theoretical innovation into actionable public knowledge and institutional capacity. Optimization should prioritize three directions: cultivating a robust topic architecture grounded in the “five features” of the Chinese path to modernization to yield a traceable knowledge genealogy; innovating integrated publishing paradigms by coordinating print–digital convergence, data-driven commissioning, multilingual translation pipelines, community-based reading programs, and feedback-loop evaluation; and building a platform-based international collaboration ecology that aligns co-publishing, joint translation, open-rights exchanges, and interconnected author–editor–scholar networks. These measures can systematically enhance the global reach and intellectual influence of China’s modernization theory.