Please wait a minute...
科技与出版  2025, Vol. 44 Issue (4): 65-75    
版权视界
古籍首版邻接权保护探析
彭学龙,张成
中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,430073,武汉
Analysis of Protecting the First Edition of Ancient Books through Neighboring Rights
PENG Xuelong,ZHANG Cheng
Intellectual Property Research Center, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 430073, WuHan
全文: HTML    PDF(1621 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

对于未曾出版传世的古籍作品,其一经点校整理出版或者公开再现,版本保护问题就会凸显。就此而言,以德国为代表的欧洲国家在著作权法中建立的首版邻接权制度不无借鉴意义。据此,对于处于公共领域、从未出版亦未公开再现的古籍作品,首次出版者、首次公开再现者享有一种与同类作品著作财产权内容相同的法定期限专有权。在我国,引进上述权利虽主要针对传统古籍,在法理上亦可适用于所有适格的公版作品。采纳这一制度安排既有利于“加大对古籍工作领域合法权益的保护力度”,又有助于我国完善版权法治和深度参与国际版权治理体系。

关键词 古籍公版作品首版权邻接权    
Abstract

The Chinese nation has a long history and splendid culture, with numerous ancient texts requiring extensive proofreading and publishing efforts. However, for ancient books that have never been published and handed down, once they are proofread, collated and published or publicly reproduced, the issue of version protection will become prominent. This paper takes the first edition neighboring rights system established in the copyright laws of European countries such as Germany as the research object. Through comparative law analysis and case analysis, it systematically demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of introducing this system in China, and puts forward specific legislative suggestions, in order to provide theoretical support for the protection of ancient books and the improvement of copyright rule of law in my country. The analysis results show that for public domain ancient books that have never been published or publicly reproduced, the first publisher and the first public reproducer can enjoy a statutory term exclusive right equivalent to the copyright property rights of comparable works. Given China's extensive collection of ancient books and unearthed classics, many of which remain unpublished or publicly unreproduced in history, it is essential to introduce the first edition neighboring rights in legislation. While these rights primarily target traditional ancient books, they can extend to all qualified public works in legal theory. Adopting this system arrangement is conducive to "strengthening the protection of legitimate rights and interests in the field of ancient books", and is also conducive to China's improvement of copyright rule of law and in-depth participation in the international copyright governance. Consequently, rather than adopting "neighboring rights of ancient books" in China's legislative texts, "neighboring rights of public domain works" should serve as a more appropriate normative expression, encompassing protection for all unpublished and publicly unreproduced works in the public domain. As a property right, the neighboring rights of public domain works should mirror the property rights inherent in copyright for similar works, subject to protection period restrictions. At the same time, this article refines the rights requirements of the first copyright and clarifies the conditions for the generation of rights, including: ①The work must be in the public domain; ②It has not been published and has not been publicly reproduced; ③The publication or reproduction behavior must be legally authorized by the owner of the carrier. In the case of ancient books collected by the state, it is recommended to include the approval of the cultural relics authorities in the "legal license" requirement to balance the relationship between protection and utilization.

Key wordsancient books    public domain works    first copyright    neighboring rights
出版日期: 2025-04-30
基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字时代知识产权法基本范畴体系创新研究”(24&ZD132)

引用本文:

彭学龙,张成. 古籍首版邻接权保护探析[J]. 科技与出版, 2025, 44(4): 65-75.
PENG Xuelong,ZHANG Cheng. Analysis of Protecting the First Edition of Ancient Books through Neighboring Rights. Science-Technology & Publication, 2025, 44(4): 65-75.

链接本文:

http://kjycb.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/      或      http://kjycb.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2025/V44/I4/65

1 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于推进新时代古籍工作的意见》[EB/OL].(2022-04-11)[2025-02-26]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202212/content_6688379.htm.
2 王静,杨捷.古籍点校成果因不具有独创性不构成作品[J].人民司法,2015(16):68-70.
3 彭学龙.古籍点校科学版本的邻接权保护[J].法商研究,2023,40(4):188-200.
4 JOSEFK.Ist ein autorschutz bei herausgabe eines ineditums zu befürworten?[J].UFITA,1987(105):163-172.
5 MANFREDR.Zum rechtsschutz der herausgabe historischer texte[J].UFITA,1987(106):255-274.
6 顾雷.古籍出版与古籍保护关系刍议[J].大学图书馆学报,2020,38(4):100-105.
7 张贺. 更好挖掘古籍的当代价值[N]. 人民日报, 2022-11-11(5).
8 刘钊. 新时代出土古籍的整理、出版与应用[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2022-07-01(4).
9 习近平: 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜?? 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗: 在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].(2022-10-25)[2025-02-26]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.
[1] 崔存明. 古籍整理出版在文化传承发展中的作用[J]. 科技与出版, 2024, 43(1): 117-124.
[2] 雷珏莹,王晓光. 数字人文视域下古籍出版的内容价值增值*[J]. 科技与出版, 2023, 42(3): 105-109.
[3] 肖超, 高兆强. 出版社古籍数字出版商业模式研究:基于商业模式画布理论*[J]. 科技与出版, 2021, 40(11): 74-84.
[4] 洪绍桢,王亮. 古籍出版物短视频运营推广策略研究*[J]. 科技与出版, 2020, 39(8): 42-49.
[5] 向波. 论人工智能生成成果的邻接权保护*[J]. 科技与出版, 2020, 39(01): 70-75.
[6] 杨丽贤. 打破僵局,开启新未来——对古籍出版的一点思考[J]. 科技与出版, 2018, 37(8): 89-92.
[7] 张永贵. 古籍类专业出版社数字化转型的若干思考——以国家图书馆出版社为例[J]. 科技与出版, 2013, 32(8): 22-24.
[8] 刘明江. 论网络环境中图书版式设计的邻接权保护[J]. 科技与出版, 2013, 32(7): 66-67.
[9] 任海霞; 杨越朝;. 做好中医古籍整理出版工作的5个关键点[J]. 科技与出版, 2013, 32(2): 41-42.
[10] 赵彬. 编辑加工科技史类图书应注意的问题[J]. 科技与出版, 2012, 31(1): 45-47.
[11] 贺科伟. 我国古籍数字化标准体系建设刍议[J]. 科技与出版, 2011, 30(8): 76-79.
[12] 刘培英. 宏扬祖国医学 做好古医籍出版工作[J]. 科技与出版, 2011, 30(5): 41-42.