|
|
|
| Exploring the Development Pathways of Youth-Friendly Academic Journals: A Structuration Theory Perspective |
| WU Yue1,2,ZHANG Yuan3,LI Mingde1,2,3 |
1. School of Journalism and New Media, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 710049, Xi’an, China 2. Xi’an Jiaotong University City College, 710018, Xi’an, China 3. Periodicals Publishing House of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 712046, Xi’an, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract From the perspective of structuration theory, youth-friendly academic journals are conceptualized as platforms that facilitate sustained engagement and profound interactions between the academic practices of early-career researchers and the structural factors inherent to academic publishing. These journals aim to seamlessly integrate their institutional objectives with the imperative of nurturing emerging scholars, thereby establishing a mutually beneficial relationship that drives collaborative progress. Through their reciprocal influence, both entities foster the advancement and prosperity of the academic community. These journals exhibit distinctive characteristics across four dimensions: subjectivity (empowering youth through epistemic agency), communicability (ensuring information transparency and responsive feedback mechanisms, and facilitating the flow of academic information), participatory capacity (creating engagement mechanisms to empower youth development), and sustainability (maintaining academic reputation and building scholarly communities). At the practical level, constructing youth-friendly academic journals requires comprehensive exploration of four strategic domains: (1) Strengthening Institutional Safeguards by enhancing national policy frameworks and optimizing journal evaluation systems to incentivize youth-inclusive practices. (2) Deepening Resource Integration by consolidating journal resources to establish supportive ecosystems for youth development. By aggregating resources to involve early-career researchers in journal operations, this approach alleviates human resource shortages while establishing replicable routine academic sharing mechanisms through resource collaboration. Concurrently, the further development and implementation of these resources—particularly through AI technologies—enable the creation of intelligent academic service platforms designed to systematically support the professional growth of emerging researchers. (3) Elevating Dissemination Efficacy: Cultivating a youth-friendly discourse environment requires building an open, respectful, and inclusive journal culture. This includes leveraging digital technologies and multimodal communication strategies to amplify the visibility and impact of early-career researchers' work, such as AI-driven content recommendation systems and interactive knowledge dissemination networks. (4) Expanding International Exchanges and Cooperation to Build a Long-term Collaborative "Youth-Journal" Academic Community. Regarding enhancing the review standards of academic journals, valuable insights can be learned from the relatively strict and fair peer-review systems and workflow processes of international academic journals. Regarding cultivating academic ethics among early-career researchers, it is essential to explore an academic ethics cultivation system that aligns with international practices and highlights Chinese characteristics. This transformation paradigm shifts journals from "output repositories" to dynamic "growth platforms," where institutional sustainability and early-career researchers' professional maturation become mutually reinforcing processes. By aligning journal operations with early-career researchers' development paths, a virtuous cycle emerges: journals gain vitality through the infusion of innovative scholarship, while early-career researchers acquire enhanced visibility and disciplinary impact through institutional support. Ultimately, the strategic convergence of journal development priorities and youth empowerment initiatives serves as a critical driver for sustained academic innovation, fostering collective progress in scholarly disciplines and the broader intellectual commons.
|
|
Published: 05 June 2025
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革??推进中国式现代化的决定[N]. 人民日报,2024-07-22(1).
|
| 2 |
怎样支持青年学者独立发表学术成果[N]. 中国青年报,2020-05-26(7).
|
| 3 |
李君安, 王政武. 学术期刊与青年学者互促共进研究[J]. 四川理工学院学报(社会科学版), 2015, 30 (3): 82- 88.
|
| 4 |
何云峰. 学术期刊作者友好性的内涵和改进策略[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 65 (1): 147- 151.
|
| 5 |
董世峰. 基于学术性的作者友好性悖论与伦理实践[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 65 (1): 135- 139.
|
| 6 |
龙亚莉, 范军. 为青年学者提供环境友好型的期刊生态: 学习《关于开展科技人才评价改革试点的工作方案》有感[J]. 科技与出版, 2022, 41 (12): 12- 18.
|
| 7 |
安东尼·吉登斯. 社会的构成[M]. 李康,李猛,译. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.
|
| 8 |
黄永亮, 杨笑宇. 青年学者的研究旨趣、困境挑战与学术使命: 以“社会学”为例[J]. 当代青年研究, 2024, 42 (6): 10- 13.
|
| 9 |
贺来. 主体性的当代哲学视域[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2013.
|
| 10 |
龚紫钰. 学术共同体视角下学术期刊支持青年学术人才成长研究[J]. 出版与印刷, 2022 (6): 85- 92.
|
| 11 |
戴丽, 胡永国, 黄文杰, 等. 高校学术期刊编辑参与研究生学术诚信体系建设的路径研究[J]. 科技与出版, 2024 (9): 34- 39.
|
| 12 |
仲伟民. 谈青年类学术期刊提高办刊质量的几个问题[J]. 中国青年社会科学, 2015 (6): 16- 19.
|
| 13 |
中共中央宣传部??教育部??科技部印发《关于推动学术期刊繁荣发展的意见》的通知[EB/OL].(2021-07-08)[2025-01-21]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-06/25/content_5620876.htm.
|
| 14 |
魏长宝. 融媒体时代学术期刊传播能力建设与高质量发展[J]. 东南学术, 2024, 37 (2): 228- 232.
|
| 15 |
毕乐, 王丹. 鼎新共创: 职教期刊编辑与学者协同科研创新探析[J]. 科技与出版, 2025 (3): 115- 123.
|
| 16 |
李明德, 陈盼盼. 高品质视域下学术期刊发展的问题透视及提升策略: 以人文社科学术期刊为例[J]. 科技与出版, 2022 (8): 38- 46.
|
| [1] |
TAO Jihua,YE Hongyan. The Value, Methods and Paths of Promoting English Abstracts of Academic Journals in the Context of International Communications[J]. Science-Technology & Publication, 2025, 44(3): 124-132. |
| [2] |
LIU Zhongxiang. Distinctive Thematic Planning and Integrated Publishing for Breakthroughs: A Review of Chinese Philosophy and Social Sciences Journals Publishing in 2024[J]. Science-Technology & Publication, 2025, 44(3): 78-86. |
| [3] |
ZHI Dandan,GUAN Xiaofei,ZHAN Lijuan,ZHANG Shuai. Multidimensional Deconstruction of Academic Journals Serving the Construction of China's Independent Knowledge System in the New Era[J]. Science-Technology & Publication, 2025, 44(1): 159-168. |
|
|
|
|