|
|
|
| Role and Risk Management Strategies for STM Journals from the Perspective of Overall National Security Concept |
| JIANG Honggui1,QIN Juanjuan2,* |
1. Editorial Office of Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 330013, Nanchang, China 2. School of Foreign Languages, Xinyu University, 338004, Xinyu, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper explores the role and risk management strategies for scientific technological, and medical (STM) journals within the framework of the Overall National Security Concept (ONSC) in China. Through a comprehensive policy-theoretical framework grounded in the ONSC, this study employs multiple research methods, including theoretical analysis, case studies, and inductive-deductive reasoning to systematically investigate how STM journals contribute to and interact with the broader landscape of national security. This study highlights the multifaceted functions of STM journals in enhancing national technological security, strengthening national soft power, safeguarding economic security, and consolidating strategic security. Additionally, it identifies a series of security risks inherent to STM journals that could potentially undermine overall national security. This study establishes the conceptual linkage between STM journals and overall national security by referencing National Security Law and other related regulations. It further examines five major categories of security risks associated with STM journals under the ONSC perspective. First, the risk of sensitive technology leakage is addressed, emphasizing that while STM journals facilitate open academic exchange, they simultaneously pose threats of critical information exposure that may affect military and economic security. Multiple documented cases of inadvertent disclosure of sensitive technologies highlight the urgency of stringent review protocols. Second, ideological security risks arising from political errors in publication content are analyzed, stressing the necessity of rigorous political review to avoid misinformation that could damage national cohesion and international relations. Third, the study discusses the impact of academic fraud on innovation security, noting increasing incidents of scientific misconduct that undermine trust and waste resources, thereby threatening the integrity of national scientific advancement. Fourth, ethical risks related to incomplete or flawed academic review procedures are considered. Fifth, social public opinion risks triggered by inappropriate content publication are identified, which may escalate into broader social disputes through rapid dissemination on digital platforms. To address these intertwined risks, this paper proposes a comprehensive risk management framework tailored to the realities of STM journals under the ONSC. Recommendations include: First, establishing dedicated review committees for sensitive technology to prevent information leakage; Second, implementing stringent political review processes to safeguard ideological security; Third, enhancing academic integrity mechanisms by combining technological tools and expert peer review to identify and prevent misconduct; Fourth, improving academic review systems to ensure ethical compliance and scientific rigor; Fifth, developing emergency response mechanisms to effectively manage social opinion crises. In conclusion, this study provides a theoretical and practical foundation for further scholarly inquiry and policy development to enhance the security governance of STM journals in the context of China’s overall national security strategy.
|
|
Published: 05 June 2025
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Juanjuan QIN
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
印波, 刘畅, 范林. 非公有资本对科技期刊渗透的乱象及其法律规制[J]. 编辑学报, 2021, 33 (6): 605- 609.
|
| 2 |
邱蕾. 情报视角下科技论文出版数据信息安全风险与管控[J]. 科技与出版, 2024 (10): 113- 118.
|
| 3 |
代妮. 科技期刊应加强保密工作[J]. 编辑学报, 2022, 34 (3): 244- 248.
|
| 4 |
王珏, 任娇菡, 杨恒, 等. 开放科学环境下我国科技论文发表中的信息安全问题与管控[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2022, 33 (12): 1599- 1608.
|
| 5 |
徐玲玲, 陶立方, 张耀斌. 科技期刊常见政治性差错例析及编校策略[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 46 (2): 235- 240.
|
| 6 |
李国昌. 论科技出版与意识形态安全[J]. 出版参考, 2019 (10): 9- 11.
|
| 7 |
李建伟. 总体国家安全观的理论要义阐释[J]. 政治与法律, 2021 (10): 65- 78.
|
| 8 |
马海群, 李钟隽, 张涛. 中国特色总体国家安全观逻辑建构解读[J]. 情报探索, 2020 (11): 1- 7.
|
| 9 |
中国科学技术信息研究所. 2024年中国科技论文统计报告[R]. 北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2024.
|
| 10 |
陶文娜, 欧阳峣. 20世纪中叶中国生物技术重大突破的经济学阐释[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2023, 52 (5): 94- 101.
|
| 11 |
李剑刚. 沃尔夫条款与中美航天合作[J]. 中国航天, 2014 (2): 42- 44.
|
| 12 |
张家年, 赵妍. “结构—流程—输出”视阈下科技安全情报体系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45 (9): 6- 14.
|
| 13 |
王育英, 王群燕. 情报视角下科技论文数据泄露风险的研判、规避与阻断[J]. 编辑学报, 2024, 36 (2): 129- 134.
|
| 14 |
李亚辉, 徐书令, 房威, 等. 学术期刊撤稿引出的出版伦理问题与对策[J]. 编辑学报, 2021, 34 (2): 176- 178.
|
| 15 |
澎湃首席评论员西坡. 马上评丨导师崇高了,师娘优美了,学术尊严怎么办?[EB/OL].(2020-01-12)[2025-01-12]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_5501136.
|
| 16 |
潘祥辉, 刘国庆. 媒体对高校舆论监督的“瞭望效应”及传播失灵: 基于2014年以来澎湃新闻对高校学术不端报道的分析[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 52 (6): 119- 124.
|
| 17 |
BRIAN JACKSON . The changing research data landscape and the experiences of ethics review board chairs[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2018, 44 (5): 603- 612.
|
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|