Please wait a minute...
科技与出版  2025, Vol. 44 Issue (2): 59-69    
融媒之光
研究者科学数据共享与出版意识提升路径研究——基于中医药领域160位研究者的一项横断面调查
郭盛楠,郝洋,王芳
中国中医科学院针灸研究所《世界针灸杂志》编辑部,100700,北京
Path to Enhancing Researchers' Awareness of Scientific Data Sharing and Publishing: A Cross-Sectional Study of 160 Researchers in the Field of Traditional Chinese Medicine
GUO Shengnan,HAO Yang,WANG Fang
Journal Center, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 100700, Beijing, China
全文: HTML    PDF(1660 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

文章基于中医药领域160位研究者,开展研究者科学数据共享与出版意识现状与提升路径的横断面调查研究,明晰现阶段我国研究者对科学数据相关概念的认知程度,明确研究者科学数据共享与出版的意识水平与层次,了解研究者获取相关知识、提高相应意识的方式与途径。调查结果提示,现阶段我国研究者对科学数据的认知停留在表面,认识较为浅表;对科学数据的存储和保管较为朴素、原始;对科学数据共享与出版抱有谨慎的开放态度;对科学数据共享与出版的知识积累与意识觉醒源于实践。提升我国研究者科学数据共享与出版意识,应该充分发挥科技期刊编辑在推进科学数据共享与出版中的领路作用,同时对研究者开展多种形式的培训,扩大数据共享与出版实践,抓住研究者的核心关切,以点带面推动科学数据共享,如此将加快推进科学数据共享与出版进程,顺应开放科学发展大势。

关键词 科学数据共享意识出版意识开放科学调查    
Abstract

Based on a cross-sectional survey of 160 researchers in the field of traditional Chinese medicine, this paper investigates the status quo of researchers' awareness regarding scientific data sharing and publishing, as well as pathways for improvement. It elucidates the extent of understanding to the concepts related to scientific data at the present stage for the Chinese researchers in the traditional Chinese medicine field, clarifies their awareness level, and examines the means and approaches through which researchers acquire relevant knowledge. The results indicate that the respondents’ cognition of scientific data is relatively superficial. The storage and regulation of scientific data are relatively simple and primitive. The respondents exhibit caution regarding sharing and publishing of scientific data. The knowledge accumulation and awareness of scientific data sharing and publishing primarily stem from practical experience. To enhance openness in scientific data sharing and publishing, three strategies are proposed in this paper. First, it is important to leverage the leading role of editors in the scientific, technological, and medical (STM) journals to foster researchers' understanding of scientific data and optimize their data management practices. Close communication between editors and researchers in daily work can provide researchers with relevant knowledge of scientific data, while editors' requirements for scientific data management can encourage researchers to upgrade their data management models. Second, various forms of training for researchers should be implemented to gradually improve researchers' cautious attitude towards open data, and expand data-sharing and publishing practices. The sharing and publishing of scientific data rely on the understanding and recognition of frontline researchers. Increasing the frequency of training and enriching the training topics can enhance researchers' engagement and ultimately influence publishing practices. Third, it is essential to address the interests that researchers prioritize, strengthen practical experience from specific case to applications in the whole area, thereby enabling individuals to continuously accumulate relevant knowledge, fostering the awakening of open consciousness, and promoting the sharing of scientific data. Scientific research has entered the era of big data, and the fourth-generation data-intensive scientific research paradigm, centered on data, has emerged. The sharing and publishing of scientific data has become an inevitable trend to promote global multilateral cooperation and build Community of Shared Future for Mankind. Through this cross-sectional survey, the Chinese researchers’ understanding to the concepts related to scientific data is clarified; their awareness of scientific data sharing and publishing is assessed; and the pathways for researchers to acquire relevant knowledge and improve their corresponding awareness are proposed, so as to provide data-driven support for the further expansion of scientific data sharing and publishing practices. Moreover, the survey process itself serves as a measure to publicize scientific data knowledge and promote the development of open science. Besides, editors of STM journals will help advance the growth of scientific data initiatives in China in the era of open science and contribute to promoting the progress of open science in China.

Key wordsscience data    sharing consciousness    publishing consciousness    open science    survey
出版日期: 2025-03-14
基金资助:中国科学技术期刊编辑学会2023—2024年度基金项目(CESSP-2023-D24);中国针灸学会“特色一流学会”建设项目

引用本文:

郭盛楠,郝洋,王芳. 研究者科学数据共享与出版意识提升路径研究——基于中医药领域160位研究者的一项横断面调查[J]. 科技与出版, 2025, 44(2): 59-69.
GUO Shengnan,HAO Yang,WANG Fang. Path to Enhancing Researchers' Awareness of Scientific Data Sharing and Publishing: A Cross-Sectional Study of 160 Researchers in the Field of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Science-Technology & Publication, 2025, 44(2): 59-69.

链接本文:

http://kjycb.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/      或      http://kjycb.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2025/V44/I2/59

表 1  参与问卷调查的中医药领域研究者一般资料一览表
图 1  研究者对科学数据相关概念与规则的认知了解现状
注:研究工作组对问题回答选项的设计遵循李克特五级分类,但对每一个问题选项的具体设置并不完全相同,并对选项里什么是“基本了解”“完全了解”进行了部分说明,便于被调查者选择,避免错分偏倚。例如,问题3,询问研究者是否听说过数据使用许可协议,研究工作组在设置问题时便对什么是数据使用许可协议进行了举例,而且规定基本了解指的是了解CC、BY、NC、ND等的具体含义,完全了解指的是了解不同数据使用许可协议之间开放程度的区别等。
表 2  研究者科学数据共享与出版的实践现状
表 3  研究者科学数据共享与出版意识水平
表 4  研究者获取科学数据相关知识方式途径排序一览表
表 5  研究者对RCT常用质量评价工具/报告规范了解程度的Spearman相关系数
1 张娜, 许洁. 面向永久学术记录的科学数据开放共享研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023 (1): 7- 14.
2 李思经, 宋立荣, 王健. 面向开放共享的科学数据出版:机遇、挑战与对策[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021 (5): 671- 679.
3 周园春,姜璐璐. 在中国迈向开放数据的进程中,政策制定者扮演了什么角色?[EB/OL].(2022-12-08)[2024-05-26]. https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20221208A03LOS00.
4 中国科学技术协会, 国际科学、技术与医学出版商协会. 中国开放获取出版发展报告(2022)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022: 28,45.
5 丛挺, 陆奕澄. 大规模开放环境下科技出版趋势展望[J]. 数字出版研究, 2022 (1): 84- 96.
6 高瑜蔚, 朱艳华, 孔丽华, 等. 数据论文及关联科学数据集出版元数据标准研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023 (10): 1270- 1282.
7 廖方宇, 胡良霖, 王健, 等. 科学数据安全标准研究与工作建议[J]. 科学通报, 2024 (9): 1142- 1148.
8 于会萍, 宛玲. 科学数据存储库的发展态势与推进策略[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022 (15): 107- 115.
9 赵秋云. 论科技期刊编辑在传播科技新知识成果中的作用[J]. 湖北科技学院学报, 2020 (6): 50- 53.
10 李文芳. 论新时代科技期刊“把关人”意识的强化与路径[J]. 编辑学报, 2023 (S2): 194- 197.
11 中国科学技术协会. 中国科协筹备成立开放科学促进联合体[EB/OL].(2022-05-06)[2024-02-19]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/t4kuaRo6NhpudP7wViFWbw.
12 张泽钰, 姜璐璐, 高瑜蔚, 等. 我国科技期刊数据政策制定研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023 (11): 1367- 1373.
13 唐静. 新时代我国高校科研人才评价体系探索[J]. 人才资源开发, 2020 (11): 10- 12.
14 任之光, 李金, 赵海川, 等. 大数据驱动的管理决策:研究范式与发展领域[J]. 管理科学学报, 2023 (8): 152- 158.
[1] 卫夏雯,祝叶华,刘晶晶,王丽娜,徐丽娇,傅雪,王微. 开放科学背景下科技期刊出版与传播模式探析*[J]. 科技与出版, 2024, 43(9): 78-84.
[2] 王培,高虹. 开放科学环境下学术期刊同行评议的优化路径*[J]. 科技与出版, 2024, 43(3): 136-143.
[3] 徐丽芳,周伊,罗婷,田峥峥. 理念革新与技术驱动:2023年海外科技期刊出版的挑战与新思路*[J]. 科技与出版, 2024, 43(3): 33-45.
[4] 陈铭. 开放科学背景下的数据出版:功能、困境与治理进路*[J]. 科技与出版, 2024, 43(10): 80-88.
[5] 徐丽芳, 邹青, 周伊, 罗婷, 田峥峥. 在博弈中迈向开放科学:2022年海外科技期刊出版与数据出版盘点*[J]. 科技与出版, 2023, 42(3): 36-49.
[6] 王胜兰,宁笔. 开放获取成因及其核心驱动力分析[J]. 科技与出版, 2023, 42(2): 35-40.
[7] 唐帅,曹兵,季淑娟,蒋伟. DOAJ收录的中国中文开放获取期刊的统计分析[J]. 科技与出版, 2023, 42(1): 124-133.
[8] 张维,冷怀明,汪勤俭,游滨,钱锋,胡英奎,邓军. 医学期刊集群化发展模式和平台建设探究*[J]. 科技与出版, 2022, 41(9): 76-85.
[9] 宁笔. 掠夺性期刊的热议与冷思考[J]. 科技与出版, 2022, 41(7): 63-67.
[10] 张黄群,孙静,张蓓,胥橙庭. “后期刊时代”再议学术期刊编辑力[J]. 科技与出版, 2022, 41(7): 123-128.
[11] 任胜利, 李响, 杨海燕, 宁笔, 陈哲. 2021年我国英文科技期刊发展回顾[J]. 科技与出版, 2022, 41(3): 73-83.
[12] 徐丽芳,陈铭,邹青,周伊,罗婷. 开放·平衡·拓界:2021年海外科技期刊出版动态研究*[J]. 科技与出版, 2022, 41(3): 31-42.
[13] 陈铭. 知识生产视域下的科学数据出版实践[J]. 科技与出版, 2022, 41(12): 102-109.
[14] 赵玉山, 程晶晶, 刘浩冰. 出版人职业生存现状调查样本报告(2019—2020年度)*[J]. 科技与出版, 2021, 40(7): 59-69.
[15] 徐丽芳, 赵雨婷, 陈铭, 邹青, 周伊. 战“疫”·开放·包容*[J]. 科技与出版, 2021, 40(3): 13-23.