Tyfield D. Transition to Science 2.0: “Remoralizing” the Economy of Science[J]. Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History & Philosophy, 2013, 7(1).
Bardi A, Manghi P. Enhanced Publications: Data Models and Information Systems[J]. Liber Quarterly the Journal of European Research Libraries, 2014, 22(4).
[5]
Woutersen-Windhouwer S, Brandsma R, Hogenaar A, et al. Enhanced Publications : Linking Publications and Research Data in Digital Repositories[J]. Amsterdam University Press, 2009.
[6]
STM position on Open Science [EB/OL]．(2016-10-30). [2018-04-28]. .
Sheet F. Errata, Retraction, Duplicate Publication, Comment, Update and Patient Summary Policy for MEDLINE [homepage on the Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); [EB/OL]. 2002 [updated 2005 Jan 21].
[12]
US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity. ORI Policy on Plagiarism [EB/OL]. [2018-09-28]. .
[13]
Wager E, Williams P. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008[J]. Journal of medical ethics, 2011, 37(9): 567-570.
[14]
Benos D J, et al. Ethics and scientific publication[J]. Advances in Physiology Education, 2005. 29: 59-74.
[15]
Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013. 110(3): 1137-1137.
[16]
Zhang M, Grieneisen M L. The impact of misconduct on the published medical and non-medical literature, and the news media[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(2): 573-587.
[17]
US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity. Historical Background [EB/OL]. [2017-11-18]. .
Committee on Publication Ethics. COPE code of conduct. (accessed 22 Sep 2010).
[20]
Oransky, I., and Marcus. A.Retraction Watch. [EB/OL].
[21]
David Mellor. The Landscape of Open Data Policies [EB/OL]. [2018-10-13] .
[22]
Errington Timothy M, Iorns Elizabeth, Gunn William, et al. An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research[J]. 2014, 3.
[23]
the Center for Open Science. Letter from the Executive Director [EB/OL]. [2018-10-13] .
[24]
the Center for Open Science. Guidelines for Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) in Journal Policies and Practices “The TOP Guidelines”[EB/OL]. [2018-10-13]. .
Kriegeskorte N, Walther A, Deca D. An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing[J]. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012, 6(2): 94.
